Tragically, the aircraft was too low to be able to restart its engines before it careered into Lake Ontario.
try again, the name must be unique Search. try again, the name must be uniquePlease In the days of the RAF chief engineer in the 1990s, you had to be on top of airworthiness. "I have given the matter considerable thought and I see no alternative but to report to the secretary of state that the Nimrod fleet should not fly until the There had been concerns in the British media about serviceability of the Nimrod fleetConcerns were again raised when on 5 November 2007, Nimrod XV235 was reported to have suffered a similar fuel leak.
33 people lost their lives in this accident. There was no doubt that the culture of the time had switched. "It seems to me that this is a case where I would be failing in my duty if I didn't report action to the relevant authority that would prevent future fatalities,"
{{#sender.isSelf}}
This resulted in the inquiry focusing on the actions of the crew, and in particular the aircraft's captain. The weather was classed as excellent, with a slight on-shore wind (the display was to take place offshore over Lake Ontario). It allows our most engaged readers to debate the big issues, share their own experiences, discuss Nothing I can say or do will bring these men back.In March 2009 in response to the writ, the Ministry of Defence admitted responsibility for the deaths of the 14 servicemen aboard Nimrod aircraft XV230, after two families brought a landmark legal action using human rights law. There were seven crew members on board. On 2 September 2006, RAF Nimrod XV230, with 14 crew members on board, was on a routine reconnaissance mission over Helmand province in Afghanistan, looking out for insurgents. real-world solutions, and more. will be published daily in dedicated articles.
On 2 September 1995, a Royal Air Force Hawker Siddeley Nimrod aircraft crashed into Lake Ontario during an air display, killing all seven crew members on board.
The aircraft involved in the accident was XV230, the first of 38 The aircraft is believed to have suffered a fuel leak or overflow during The fire was first noted when smoke accumulated in the bomb-bay, leading the pilot to report a fire in his bomb-bay. Victims: Flt Sgt Adrian Davies, Flt Lt Lee Mitchelmore, Flt Lt Gareth Nicholas, Sgt Ben Knight and Sgt Gary Quilliam, Flt Lt Steven Swarbrick, Sgt John Langton. The most insightful comments on all subjects I am sorry for the mistakes that have been made and the lives that have been lost as a result of our failure. The Board’s findings were made public on 4 December 2007.
{{#replies}} to your comment. Start your Independent Premium subscription today.Are you sure you want to mark this comment as inappropriate?Independent Premium Comments can be posted by members of our membership scheme, Independent Premium. There are no comments yet - be the first to add your thoughts
Remove all; Disconnect; The next video is starting stop. Following the inquiry, it was decided that a single crew, made up of instructors, would be specially selected from the Nimrod Exactly eleven years after the accident in Toronto, another Nimrod from 120 Squadron was The official inquiry into the crash in September 1995 concluded that Flight Lieutenant Dom Gilbert, 31, altered a display manoeuvre causing the jet engines to stall. This was the second loss of an RAF Nimrod in four months, following the ditching of a Nimrod R1 in May. The best opportunity to prevent the accident to XV230 was tragically lostHaddon-Cave condemned the change of organisational culture within the MoD between 1998 and 2006, when financial targets came to distract from safety, quoting a former senior RAF officer who told the inquiry: